IFS report: SNP come out on top in Fiscal Framework deal

22/03/2016
david

Think tank finds that that a lack of borrowing powers could leave the Scottish economy vulnerable

THE INSTITUTE FOR FISCAL STUDIES has released analysis that Scotland could benefit to the tune of up to PS300m per year as a result of a deal reached between the Scottish Government and the UK treasury last month.

A deal was finally reached on 23 February on the so called Fiscal Framework – the funding deal that will underpin the devolution of new tax and spending powers to Scotland.

The tortuous negotiations became bogged-down on the interpretation of the ‘no detriment’ principle, by which neither the Scottish nor UK Governments should suffer financial loss as a result of a deal. The Scottish Government repeatedly insisted that treasury offers would leave Scotland out of pocket.

The IFS have found that the deal finally reached could see the Scottish Government income increase by around PS300m more per year until 2021-22 under the Scottish Government’s preferred funding model.

One of the authors of the report, David Phillips, a senior economist with the IFS said: “It was never going to be possible to design a Fiscal Framework that satisfied all the Smith Commission’s principles: they are mutually incompatible.

“The final deal begs the question of whether the UK government has changed its mind or merely conceded the point.” David Phillips, IFS

“In the end, the Scottish Government’s preferred approach was chosen, which prioritises the ‘no detriment’ principle. During the negotiations, the UK government had claimed this approach was unfair because it violates the ‘taxpayer fairness’ principle. This begs the question of whether the UK government has changed its mind or merely conceded the point.”

The UK treasury consistently countered Scottish Government insistence on no detriment with another principal established under the Smith Commission, established to arrive at a new devolved settlement following the Scottish Independence referendum, that of ‘tax-payer fairness’, which they said meant a reduction in funds apportioned to the Scottish Government.

The IFS report concludes that the treasury abandoned this attempt during the heated negotiations, which saw Scottish finance minister John Swinney clash with treasury official Gregg Hands for more than a week after the initial 14 February deadline for an agreement.

However the report also found that the negotiations left the Scottish Government with restricted abilities to borrow and build up cash reserves, and that this could leave the Scottish Economy vulnerable in times of hardship.

At the height of the negotiations, the Scottish Affairs Committee chairman and SNP MP Pete Wishart told CommonSpace that treasury hostility to the traditional method of funding the Scottish Parliament – the Barnett Formula – was holding back proceedings .

CommonSpace journalism is completely free from the influence of advertisers and is only possible with your continued support. Please contribute a monthly amount towards our costs . Build the Scotland you want to live in – support our new media.

Picture courtesy of Stuart R Brown