Laura Wood: Why we highlighted the complicity of civil engineering in Qatari migrant abuse

16/06/2016
JenStout

Glasgow activist Laura Wood, who chairs the Glasgow Anti-Slavery group, writes for CommonSpace about why she organised the recent demonstration on migrant rights and slavery, and what happened when she confronted a room full of civil engineers about the appalling conditions on the Qatari projects they were discussing.

I HAD HEARD through the grapevine about the Institution of Civil Engineers holding a lecture on the construction of Qatari stadiums. 

The construction of infrastructure for the Qatar World Cup has been cited in the deaths of thousands of migrant workers as well as various other human rights abuses.

The lecture was being held at the Technology and Innovation department of the University of Strathclyde. This was a perfect place and opportunity for Anti-Slavery International, along with other groups including Unison, to ask engineers to consider their role in the perpetuation of slavery-like conditions in the construction of the Qatar World Cup infrastructure and venues.
 
On Thursday June 9th at 5pm there were only 5 of us protesting outside the venue but we got to really engage with people going into the conference (around 100 in attendance) and people on the street. One memorable chat was with a civil engineering student who had no idea about the human rights issues in Gulf countries. Everyone was interested to learn more. 

They were delighted to hear that the director of Anti Slavery International, Aidan McQuade, had also trained as a Civil Engineer.

It was a chance to explain what we were asking the ICE to do: Join Anti-Slavery International in asking the Qatari government to end the ‘Kafala’ system that facilitates forced labour.

Under this system, migrant workers have to ask permission to get an exit visa in order to be able to leave the country, and they aren’t allowed to join a trade union – so we were also asking ICE to demand that workers be allowed to form committees without retribution. We also seek transparency from ICE in all processes.

So what happened at the lecture? Sara Thiam, the Regional Director from ICE, was inclusive and welcoming. She ushered us into the meeting, and made a welcome speech before the lecture, which wouldn't have happened if we hadn't been there.

In his lecture, Burridge mentioned that the workers had had problems with heat “and other things but I'll not go into that now.”

The speech was on the topic of ethics, and she said we were welcome to be there so they could hear our opinions. They were delighted to hear that the director of Anti Slavery International, Aidan McQuade, had also trained as a Civil Engineer. And Sara added that they would be happy to work with us in the future.

Onto the speaker for the evening: Jim Burridge for Arup [the global services firm which won the bid to design the Qatari 2022 World Cup stadium]. In his lecture, Burridge mentioned that the workers had had problems with heat “and other things but I'll not go into that now.”

I got to ask a question:

"You've considered the culture and climate conditions of Qatar thoroughly through such things as the drainage system, wind, temperature, concern about the sun getting in spectators’ eyes.

Did you consider the Qatar laws and culture of the Kafala system which perpetuate human rights exploitation, slavery and death of workers on the construction of the stadium as thoroughly as you did the weather?

You didn't want to get into how it was built and the temperature the workers are working in, is that because people are dying in the process? Did you not want to get into it because the workers are not allowed to leave the country, as they were being denied an exit visa? Or allowed to change job or join a union? Or is it just the basic awful living conditions that you didn't want to talk about?"

I said it in a polite and firm tone.

Burridge said "Yes, but I'll not get into that now.”

Sara took the microphone and answered my question for Burridge! The answer was some more ethical practices chat; she repeated that she is looking forward to working with ASI.

There were only 5 of us protesting outside the venue but we got to really engage with people going into the conference

I was very disappointed that he would not be answering my question. How exactly had they considered these things? MarieClaire, from our group, had her hand up to ask but was denied the chance as we were out of time.

I'm happy with how the evening went: that they were inclusive and welcoming, that I got to ask my question in front of a room full of civil engineers who will hopefully think a bit about it on their next project. And also that our director is in touch with the ICE now to discuss supply chains.

My attention, however, will not be diverted while migrant workers human rights are being abused. I’m disappointed that our questions were not answered directly and that we were out of time. Unfortunately for migrant workers in Qatar, they are also running out of time.

Picture courtesy of Omar Chatriwala

Check out what people are saying about how important CommonSpace is. Pledge your support today.